<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crowds are Dull, Committees are Deadly, Creativity Needs Freedom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.permissiontosuck.com/crowds-are-dull/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.permissiontosuck.com/crowds-are-dull/</link>
	<description>Fearless Pursuit of Creativity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:38:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://www.permissiontosuck.com/crowds-are-dull/comment-page-1/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.permissiontosuck.com/?p=1850#comment-612</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll bet we agree but a short post is getting in the way.  Using the alphabet as an example:

The alphabet is useful, like a commodity, but a beautiful typeface doesn&#039;t often come from committees does it?

Creative collaboration isn&#039;t what I consider &quot;a crowd&quot; nor is an open source community a committee.  

I&#039;m not sure I get the Dead Head reference.  The Dead leveraged their crowds that were full of extremely creative people, but from a distance - they look like every other crowd.

I think the missed communication is in the difference between creative collaboration and committees; communities and crowds.  One has creative freedom and one doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll bet we agree but a short post is getting in the way.  Using the alphabet as an example:</p>
<p>The alphabet is useful, like a commodity, but a beautiful typeface doesn&#8217;t often come from committees does it?</p>
<p>Creative collaboration isn&#8217;t what I consider &#8220;a crowd&#8221; nor is an open source community a committee.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I get the Dead Head reference.  The Dead leveraged their crowds that were full of extremely creative people, but from a distance &#8211; they look like every other crowd.</p>
<p>I think the missed communication is in the difference between creative collaboration and committees; communities and crowds.  One has creative freedom and one doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Burney</title>
		<link>http://www.permissiontosuck.com/crowds-are-dull/comment-page-1/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>David Burney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.permissiontosuck.com/?p=1850#comment-611</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I&#039;m missing something, but I&#039;m not convinced that the statement that leads this post is accurate or fair, Bruce. While it&#039;s easy to lump all groups together into one mass, there is substantial difference between committees and teams; clubs and communities; marketing campaigns and movements. 

Is the creation of the alphabet any less significant because it lacks a designated genius to attribute it to? Is sending a man to the moon less brilliant than the invention of geometry simply because we can&#039;t point to an individual like Euclid? What was more brilliant: Jefferson&#039;s prose or the Continental Congress&#039; creation? Was George Carlin more brilliant than Monty Python? 

I&#039;m just not convinced that one form of brilliance is more brilliant that the other? 

Clearly, there is great brilliance in the individual–that should continue to be acknowledged and celebrated. But it simply doesn&#039;t follow logically that the &#039;crowd&#039; or a community or a movement of people can&#039;t be brilliant too. I&#039;m afraid the open source development community is ample proof that a community can be brilliant. Yet, within that same community individual participants such as Linus Torvald proves that attribution need not be an issue. Check out the Creative Commons. 

As for the crowd being boring, mention that to any Dead Head and see what their response is. 

Nah. I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m missing something, but I&#8217;m not convinced that the statement that leads this post is accurate or fair, Bruce. While it&#8217;s easy to lump all groups together into one mass, there is substantial difference between committees and teams; clubs and communities; marketing campaigns and movements. </p>
<p>Is the creation of the alphabet any less significant because it lacks a designated genius to attribute it to? Is sending a man to the moon less brilliant than the invention of geometry simply because we can&#8217;t point to an individual like Euclid? What was more brilliant: Jefferson&#8217;s prose or the Continental Congress&#8217; creation? Was George Carlin more brilliant than Monty Python? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just not convinced that one form of brilliance is more brilliant that the other? </p>
<p>Clearly, there is great brilliance in the individual–that should continue to be acknowledged and celebrated. But it simply doesn&#8217;t follow logically that the &#8216;crowd&#8217; or a community or a movement of people can&#8217;t be brilliant too. I&#8217;m afraid the open source development community is ample proof that a community can be brilliant. Yet, within that same community individual participants such as Linus Torvald proves that attribution need not be an issue. Check out the Creative Commons. </p>
<p>As for the crowd being boring, mention that to any Dead Head and see what their response is. </p>
<p>Nah. I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://www.permissiontosuck.com/crowds-are-dull/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.permissiontosuck.com/?p=1850#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Complexity takes collaboration for sure.  It&#039;s most interesting to me that you emphasized the need for finding the smallest group of talent appropriate for the project.  My take away from that smaller groups allow the individual to operate as free as possible within a collaborative project.  Thanks John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complexity takes collaboration for sure.  It&#8217;s most interesting to me that you emphasized the need for finding the smallest group of talent appropriate for the project.  My take away from that smaller groups allow the individual to operate as free as possible within a collaborative project.  Thanks John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Romano</title>
		<link>http://www.permissiontosuck.com/crowds-are-dull/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>John Romano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.permissiontosuck.com/?p=1850#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Often the lone artist creates something brilliant. Ji Lee&#039;s Bubble project is a fantastic example. 

The problem is that large projects or campaign are no longer the result of a single stroke of brilliance because they require the talents of different kinds of people. The trick is finding the smallest group, who have all the necessary talents, to work together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often the lone artist creates something brilliant. Ji Lee&#8217;s Bubble project is a fantastic example. </p>
<p>The problem is that large projects or campaign are no longer the result of a single stroke of brilliance because they require the talents of different kinds of people. The trick is finding the smallest group, who have all the necessary talents, to work together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.permissiontosuck.com/crowds-are-dull/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.permissiontosuck.com/?p=1850#comment-372</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by brucedeboer: Crowds are Dull, Committees are Deadly, Creativity Needs Freedom - http://www.permissiontosuck.com/crowds-are-dull/...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by brucedeboer: Crowds are Dull, Committees are Deadly, Creativity Needs Freedom &#8211; <a href="http://www.permissiontosuck.com/crowds-are-dull/.." rel="nofollow">http://www.permissiontosuck.com/crowds-are-dull/..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

